12
Supreme Court News: The Supreme Court is angry with the action of ED against government liquor company Tasmac. The bench said that the Enforcement Directorate has crossed all limits.
Supreme Court News : Government liquor company in Tamil Nadu TASMAC Enforcement Directorate (ED) Supreme Court regarding raids of (Supreme Court) Has taken a tough stance. The apex court stopped the investigation in the money laundering case being done by the agency and has also issued a notice. Apart from this, the court said on Thursday that the Enforcement Directorate has been beyond all the boundaries and is violating the federal concept of the government.
ASG opposed SC talks
Government of Tamil Nadu and Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) Had filed a petition in the apex court against the ED investigation. After this Chief Justice BR Gavai (BR GAVAI) And Justice Augustine George Christ (Justice Augustine George Still) The bench presented the additional Solicitor General SV Raju presented by the investigating agency in the prohibition case (St. Paradise) Said that your Enforcement Directorate is crossing all limits. The court further said that the federal concept is violating. At the same time, the bench also said that the ED investigation against Tasmac will not proceed. At the same time, the Additional Solicitor General opposed the order and said that the matter is related to corruption of more than 1 thousand crore rupees and the investigating agency is not crossing its boundaries.
How to raid Tasmac
The bench listened to the arguments of senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Amitanand Tiwari and came to know that the state has registered more than 40 FIRs in cases related to allotment of license distribution of liquor shops since 2014 and ED has jumped and raided Tasmac in this case. The bench then asked how you can raid Tasmac operated by the state? The petition filed by the state government filed in the Supreme Court challenged the 23 April order of the Madras High Court in which his petitions to carry forward the action of ED were rejected. Explain that ED to ED’s Prevention of Money (PMLA) It was allowed to continue its action under.
Also read- Government doctor’s act: Used to make pornographic videos in the disguise of women, studios made housing
